Wednesday, August 6, 2014
Opiniion: NJ Must Re-Evaluate Developmental Center Transfers
Almost three decades ago the Krautman family of Fair Lawn struggled to find a local community living facility for their daughter Stacie, who has a severe form of Down syndrome. They could not find a New Jersey facility to meet their daughter’s unique needs but, thankfully, they found one in neighboring New York that did.
But after 27 years of living in New York, Stacie and hundreds of others living in out-of-state facilities are being uprooted by the Christie administration and forced to move back to New Jersey. Why? Because the state qualifies for additional federal funding if Stacie and others live here.
Friday, June 13, 2014
NJ Assembly Considers Halting Transfers
Two unexplained deaths, push to return residents from out-of-state centers, disturb families and advocates.
- Dawn Apgar
Friday, August 2, 2013
New Jersey Agency Aims for Full Community Integration
”Having those with developmental disabilities fully integrated into the community is what Community Access Unlimited is striving for, especially with state plans to close two developmental centers; the Woodbridge Developmental Center and the North Jersey Developmental Center in Totowa.
Friday, February 15, 2013
Legislation Planned to Halt Closing of Two New Jersey Developmental Centers
Thursday, September 20, 2012
Court Order State to Release Documents
The ruling came in a lawsuit filed by the Center for Investigative Reporting in Sacramento County Superior Court in January, seeking citations issued to developmental centers in Los Angeles, Orange, Sonoma, Riverside, Tulare and San Jose counties.
Read more here: http://www.sacbee.com/2012/09/18/4836468/court-orders-state-to-release.html#storylink=cpy
Sunday, August 5, 2012
Panel Urges N.J. to Expand Community Services
But the governor’s office stopped short of making that commitment. In a statement Friday, a spokesman for Governor Christie said only that the administration will continue to make “significant investments” in community services for the developmentally disabled.
Wednesday, May 30, 2012
Editorial: Community Care First
The facilities, including prisons and centers for the developmentally disabled, are unneeded and hugely expensive. The services they provide can be done much more efficiently, and their high cost puts a squeeze on funding available for other social services.
Now we're coming down to the final decisions in Springfield on state spending for the next fiscal year. The closing of the facilities are a bargaining chip.
Monday, February 20, 2012
As Virginia Prepares to Close Centers, Agencies Await Flood of Need
RICHMOND, Va. -- Virginia will close its training centers for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities in the next 10 years, putting more than 1,000 individuals into community-based programs that already have lengthy waiting lists for their services.
Residents in state institutions will return to their communities and to a system of group homes and day programs by 2021 as part of an agreement between the state and the U.S. Department of Justice. The agreement ends legal action against the state started by department. The agreement will phase out four of five state institutions, which currently house about 1,000 residents total.
The state has agreed to provide funding for more than 4,000 additional people to be treated by community services agencies by 2021. But officials admit that will not cover all of the need. Thousands of people across the state have qualified for care in community programs but are receiving minimal treatment because no state funding is available.
Thursday, June 30, 2011
Developmental Center Review is a Necessity
VINELAND, N.J. -- State Sen. Jeff Van Drew's bill to create a task force to conduct a thorough review of the state's seven developmental centers and develop a plan for their future is the only way to go before any decisions on closures are made.
Unfortunately, this apparently wasn't done before the proposed closure of the Vineland Developmental Center was included in the governor's budget.
The Christie administration and Department of Human Services should have conducted such a thorough review and considered many factors before making any decision. Then, they would have known the:
• Economic impact on the community of closing a particular center.
• Ability of the surrounding community to provide the necessary services and support to those with developmental disabilities.
• Projected repair and maintenance costs.
• Number of patients within the centers who require 24/7 supervision.
• Number of patients and their families who expressed a desire to remain in a developmental center.
Even after a plan is developed, one or more of the developmental centers statewide could be closed. But then residents and the state will have all the facts to make an informed decision that's the best option to ensure taxpayers save money, economic hardships are shared fairly by North and South Jersey, and all center clients and their families continue to be served well.
Tuesday, June 28, 2011
N.J. Task Force to Review Centers
The task force also would develop a plan for the future of developmental centers in this state, which could include plans for facility closures.
"This will ensure that residents and their families are able to decide the best course of care going forward should a closure occur, and that no one region of the state will be unduly harmed," he said.
.jpg)